Enjin?

[Grimm]

I think we should use enjin.. its a LOT easier.

[topix]

?

[Bishop96]

Looks pretty cool.

[Bishop96]

www.enjin.com/

[Loggahead]

I personally prefer the look of clean, no-nonsense forums. Seems more productive. I've looked at Enjin and the sites it generates are generally overcluttered imo.

I'm curious to know what others think about these particular forums vs a guild engine site like enjin.

[thegudge]

I think the current website is just fine. I also like the uncluttered look.

[willard]

This site works just fine. I prefer less cluttered sites also.

[Zypher Wynn]

I like less clutter myself.

[akires]

One cool thing about Enjin is that you can have an in-game client where you can share screenshots and stuff instantly.

[rutherfjord]

I'm fine with this site, but I haven't used Enjin before. I guess I don't know what capabilities we're missing out on.

[kipp]

This site has a few little things that bother me navigation wise, but nothing that would be worth changing sites.

I am curious what features Enjin will have related to character and guild roster imports, but until those things are actually operational it is hard to know if they would be useful. I'm thinking that if Enjin could generate a list of crafting professions and recipes known by guild members that could be useful.

[morgwath]

Kipp pretty well summed up my feelings. instead of repeating it i'll just say yeah me too

[Loggahead]

Im thinking that Enjin can possibly do what your asking about character rosters. Not sure though.